Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

Preclinical efficacy and clinical safety of clinical-grade nebulized allogenic adipose mesenchymal stromal cells-derived extracellular vesicles.

Shi MM., Yang QY., Monsel A., Yan JY., Dai CX., Zhao JY.

Clinical Trial, published in J Extracell Vesicles (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
J Extracell Vesicles (2021)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34429860
DOI
10.1002/jev2.12134
NCT
NCT04313647

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) turn out to be a promising source of cell-free therapy. Here, we investigated the biodistribution and effect of nebulized human adipose-derived MSC-EVs (haMSC-EVs) in the preclinical lung injury model and explored the safety of nebulized haMSC-EVs in healthy volunteers. DiR-labelled haMSC-EVs were used to explore the distribution of nebulized haMSC-EVs in the murine model. Pseudomonas aeruginosa -induced murine lung injury model was established, and survival rate, as well as WBC counts, histology, IL-6, TNF-α and IL-10 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were measured to explore the optimal therapeutic dose of haMSC-EVs through the nebulized route. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were involved and received the haMSC-EVs once, ranging from 2 × 10 8 particles to 16 × 10 8 particles ( MEXVT study, NCT04313647 ). Nebulizing haMSC-EVs improved survival rate to 80% at 96 h in P. aeruginosa -induced murine lung injury model by decreasing lung inflammation and histological severity. All volunteers tolerated the haMSC-EVs nebulization well, and no serious adverse events were observed from starting nebulization to the 7th day after nebulization. These findings suggest that nebulized haMSC-EVs could be a promising therapeutic strategy, offering preliminary evidence to promote the future clinical applications of neb

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
AdolescentAdultAnimalsBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalExtracellular VesiclesFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.