Level D· Preclinical EvidenceLaboratory Study

Preclinical safety and efficacy of an allogeneic adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell medicinal product for rotator cuff repair: a two-phase experimental study.

Lopiz Y., Ponz-Lueza V., Arvinius C., Rodríguez-Bobada C., Rojo-Pérez F., Tornero-Esteban P.

Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 24 on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Shoulder Elbow Surg (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
24
PMID
42297179
DOI
10.1016/j.jse.2026.06.005

Abstract (original English)

Cell therapy with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) is a promising biological augmentation strategy for rotator cuff repair; however, before clinical translation, regulatory frameworks mandate rigorous preclinical characterization of safety. We report the complete preclinical program evaluating both the safety of an allogeneic ASC-based cell therapy medicinal product (CTMP) and its efficacy in a chronic rotator cuff tear model. Phase I (safety, 164 immunodeficient nude BALB/c mice) assessed toxicity, biodistribution, and tumorigenicity after intra-articular and intravenous administration at doses ranging from 10× to 1,000× the projected clinical dose. Toxicity was evaluated by biochemical panels and full-body histopathology at 90 days. Biodistribution was quantified by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (days 45 and 90) and human-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Alu-repeat) at 90 days. Tumorigenicity used an HT-29 positive-control model. Phase II (efficacy, 48 Sprague-Dawley rats) used a validated 4-week chronic supraspinatus tear-and-repair model; after repair, animals received ASCs in suspension (n = 24) or Hypothermosol vehicle (n = 24) and were assessed histologically (Åström-Rausing scale) and biomechanically (Instron 4,411) at 4 months. In Phase I, no biochemical or histopathological toxicity attributable to the

What this study does not prove

  • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence comes from animal or laboratory studies and has not been confirmed in humans.

How we grade evidence

Related research