Preclinical Volume Retention of Fat Grafts Processed with REVOLVE™ Technology or Decantation Methods in Irradiated and Nonirradiated Wounds
Campbell CA., Grogan GM., St Jean S., Kabaria N., Gardocki-Sandor M., Cottler PS.
Laboratory Study with a reported sample of 6, published in J Clin Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- J Clin Med (2025)
- Reported sample size
- 6
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40364132
- PMCID
- PMC12072905
- DOI
- 10.3390/jcm14093100
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Background: The processing of harvested fat for transplantation is critical to fat graft performance. In breast reconstruction, larger volumes of fat are being grafted and, in some clinical cases, are being implanted within radiated tissue. This preclinical animal study evaluated the effects of radiation on retention volume and fat graft quality after processing by decantation or REVOLVE™ technology (Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company), a filtration-based device that can process lipoaspirates and remove unwanted contaminants prior to grafting. Methods: Lipoaspirate was collected from human donors ( n = 6), processed using either REVOLVE™ technology or decantation, and implanted (0.5 cc) into 60 athymic mice for 4 weeks with or without a single 35-Gy radiation dose 12 weeks prior. Volume composition, MRI, and weight-based volumetric assessment of grafted fat were performed and compared between radiated and non-radiated mice. Results: Volume composition analysis demonstrated significantly higher fat content and lower aqueous fluid with REVOLVE™ technology than with decantation, with minimal cellular debris and free oil. MRI-based and weight-based volume analysis demonstrated a significantly higher percent retention with REVOLVE™ technology than decantation in nonirradiated and irradiated sites, respectively. Pathology scoring showed a significant decrease in fibrosis within g
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.