Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Probing the Phase Composition and Surface Roughness in the Biological Response of Additively Manufactured Titanium Alloy Bioimplants

Yang L., Hou Y., Meng D., Bagasol A., Wu F., Browne DJ.

Laboratory Study on Face & Skin, Hip, published in ACS Omega (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
ACS Omega (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41552443
PMCID
PMC12809321
DOI
10.1021/acsomega.5c08853

Abstract (original English)

Titanium alloys, mainly Ti-6Al-4V, are renowned for their impressive strength-to-weight ratio and stand as some of the most widely used metallic materials for bioimplants. Additive manufacturing introduces a paradigm shift in the short turnaround times for the availability of such implants. The biological performance of these implants is critical to ensure their success and is understood to be affected by a variety of factors, including surface characteristics and phase composition of the material, often determined by the manufacturing approach. The experimental investigation of the difference in biological performance caused by surface roughness and phase compositions resulting from manufacturing methods that involve laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and hot isostatic pressing (HIP) has been conducted. Surface roughness was found to be the prevailing effect over the reported phase composition difference, with a relatively rougher surface seeming to be better for biological performance in this contribution. Meanwhile, HIP-ed Ti-6Al-4V samples exhibit better cell viability compared to that of the as-built LPBF-ed Ti-6Al-4V samples.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research