Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Progress toward the clinical application of patient-specific pluripotent stem cells

Kiskinis E., Eggan K.

Narrative Review on Neuroinflammation, published in J Clin Invest (2010) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Clin Invest (2010)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
20051636
PMCID
PMC2798698
DOI
10.1172/jci40553
Citations
238

Abstract (original English)

Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are generated by epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cells through the exogenous expression of transcription factors. These cells, just like embryonic stem cells, are likely to have a major impact on regenerative medicine, because they self-renew and retain the potential to be differentiated into all cell types of the human body. In this Review, we describe the current state of iPS cell technology, including approaches by which they are generated and what is known about their biology, and discuss the potential applications of these cells for disease modeling, drug discovery, and, eventually, cell replacement therapy.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsHumansMiceParkinson DiseaseAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisCell DifferentiationEmbryonic Stem CellsDrug Discovery

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research