Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Progress in Transdifferentiation of Autologous Alternative Cell Sources into Corneal Epithelial Cells

Wang B., Zhao JL., Cai WY., Wang GY., Li YZ., Wang JS.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Stem Cell Rev Rep (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Stem Cell Rev Rep (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39480612
PMCID
PMC11762461
DOI
10.1007/s12015-024-10808-1
Citations
5

Abstract (original English)

Corneal limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) play a crucial role in corneal epithelium regeneration. Severe damage to these cells can result in limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), characterized by repeated corneal conjunctivalization, leading to corneal turbidity and scar formation. Restoring functional LESCs and their ecological location are essential for treating LSCD. The goal of this review is to provide researchers and clinicians with key insights into LESCs biology and to conclude the current cell-based therapies advancement in LSCD treatments. Therapeutic cell resources mainly include mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), skin keratinocyte stem cells (SKCs), and oral mucosal epithelial cells (OMECs).

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Epithelium, CornealLimbus CorneaeEpithelial CellsMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsHumansCorneal DiseasesTransplantation, AutologousCell TransdifferentiationInduced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research