The promise of regenerative medicine in the treatment of urogenital disorders.
Keshel SH., Rahimi A., Hancox Z., Ebrahimi M., Khojasteh A., Sefat F.
Narrative Review, published in J Biomed Mater Res A (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- J Biomed Mater Res A (2020)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 32270582
- DOI
- 10.1002/jbm.a.36942
- Citations
- 8
Abstract (original English)
Polymers and scaffolds are the most significant tools in regenerative medicine. Urogenital disorders are an important group of diseases that greatly affect the patient's life expectancy and quality. Reconstruction of urogenital defects is one of the current challenges in regenerative medicine. Regenerative medicine, as well as tissue engineering, may offer suitable approaches, while the tools needed are appropriate materials and cells. Autologous urothelial cells obtained from biopsy, bone marrow-derived stem cells, adipose stem cells and urine-derived stem cells that expressed mesenchymal cell markers are the cells that mainly used. In addition, two main types of biomaterials mainly exist; synthetic polymers and composite scaffolds that are biodegradable polymers with controllable properties and naturally derived biomaterials such as extracellular matrix components and acellular tissue matrices. In this review, we present and evaluate the most appropriate and suitable scaffolds (naturally derived and synthetic polymers) and cells applied in urogenital reconstruction.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.