Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Promoting bone generation through the accordion technique in critical-sized bone defects: a review

Wang Z., Li H., Yang J., Du Y., Jiang L., Tang L.

Narrative Review, published in Int J Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Int J Surg (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40717594
PMCID
PMC12626548
DOI
10.1097/js9.0000000000003053

Abstract (original English)

Critical-sized bone defects caused by trauma, infection, tumor resection, or congenital malformation pose formidable challenges in orthopedic reconstruction. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has been extensively applied due to its dual capacity for bone and soft tissue regeneration. However, delayed consolidation often leads to prolonged external fixation, increasing the risk of complications. The accordion technique (AT), also known as cyclic distraction-compression, has emerged as a promising mechanical stimulation strategy to enhance bone regeneration by modulating axial micromotion at the osteotomy site. Nevertheless, the optimal parameters (timing, amplitude, and frequency) remain undefined, and the AT's underlying mechanisms are still under investigation. This review systematically summarizes experimental and clinical evidence concerning the AT within DO, with a focus on its biomechanical principles, operational strategies, and biological effects. We further highlight key challenges and future directions for translating this approach into standardized clinical protocols, aiming to provide theoretical and practical references for the treatment of complex bone defects.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansOsteogenesis, DistractionOsteotomyBone RegenerationBiomechanical Phenomena

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.