Prospective analysis of temporomandibular joint reconstruction in ankylosis with sternoclavicular graft and buccal fat pad lining.
Singh V., Dhingra R., Bhagol A.
Prospective Study with a reported sample of 10, published in J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2011) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Prospective Study
- Journal
- J Oral Maxillofac Surg (2011)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- 10
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 21764199
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.129
Abstract (original English)
To evaluate the feasibility of sternoclavicular graft (SCG) as an adaptive center along with buccal fat pad (BFP) lining for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction in TMJ ankylosis. A prospective, preliminary, short-term study with only 6 months' follow-up was performed in 10 patients with TMJ ankylosis. All patients had complete osseous ankylosis, and the mean duration of ankylosis was 6.4 years (range, 3 to 13 years). Interpositional arthroplasty with SCG along with BFP lining was done in all cases. Postoperative clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed for 6 to 9 months. Maximum interincisal opening at 6 months' follow-up was 35.6 ± 4.97 mm (range, 31 to 45 mm). Similarly, protrusive movement at follow-up of 6 months was 2.7 ± 1.25 mm (range, 1.5 to 5.5 mm), whereas laterotrusive movement was 4.1 ± 1.98 mm (range, 1.5 to 7.0 mm) toward the affected side and 2.4 ± 0.99 mm (range, 1 to 4.0 mm) toward the normal side. After 3 months, 9 of 10 patients had no pain on function, and all the patients were relieved of pain at the end of 6 months. On radiographic follow-up at 9 months, there was noticeably significant adaptation and remodeling of SCG as observed on panoramic radiography and computed tomography scan. In all the patients there was some degree of mandibular deviation toward the operated side, although the occlusion was satisfactory and they were pleased wi
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.