Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMedOpen access

Proteomic profile data of rabbit stem cell secretome and stem cell/tenocyte secretome and gene expression data, scratch assay data and CAM assay data of tenocyte in vitro cultures treated with these two different secreto

Wolint P., Miescher I., Mechakra A., Jäger P., Rieber J., Calcagni M.

Laboratory Study on Tendon Injury, Scar, published in Data Brief (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
Data Brief (2025)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40655991
PMCID
PMC12246857
DOI
10.1016/j.dib.2025.111789
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Tendon rupture repairs exhibit two main problems. On the one hand side, they often lead to scar formation during healing, which has inferior mechanical properties and may lead to re-ruptures. On the other hand side, fibrotic adhesion formation to the surrounding tissue may occur, which hampers proper range of motion. Cell-free approaches to support tendon healing are getting increasing attention worldwide. We have therefore obtained two different cell secretomes from New Zealand White rabbit adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) or from a 3:1 mixed culture of ADSCs and rabbit Achilles tenocytes. These cell secretomes were examined and compared in terms of their proteomic profiles and biological activities. Applied to a tenocyte in vitro culture, gene expression analysis data and scratch assay data are provided. To determine the angiogenic potential, the chorioallantoic membrane of the chicken embryo (CAM) was treated with the secretomes.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research