Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Pseudogene: Relevant or Irrelevant?

Lin YH., Yeh CT., Chen CY., Lin KH.

Narrative Review, published in Biomed J (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biomed J (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39305992
PMCID
PMC12164029
DOI
10.1016/j.bj.2024.100790
Citations
7

Abstract (original English)

With the advancement of high-throughput technologies, the pivotal role of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) as a master regulator of various biological functions has become increasingly apparent. Historically considered non-functional and labeled as "junk DNA," pseudogenes can be transcribed into RNA, indicating a potential role similar to ncRNAs. Recent research suggests that some pseudogenes can encode functional peptides or proteins. A growing body of evidence has revealed that pseudogenes and their derived functional molecules are involved in various biological processes and can serve as prognostic markers in cancers. This review comprehensively summarizes and discusses the current understanding of the functional roles of pseudogenes and their derived molecules in biological functions.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansNeoplasmsRNA, UntranslatedPseudogenes

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.