Quality and Vitality of Autologous Fat Grafts Harvested by Different Techniques: A Clinical Comparison Study.

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

• Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
• Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
• Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
• Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
• Emerging · Emerging topic under active research

Abstract (original English)

Background Unpredictable outcomes with autologous fat grafting due to reabsorption processes present a major challenge for healthcare providers and patients. A higher number of viable adipocytes is considered to result in a higher volume being retained. Although various adverse factors have been extensively researched, other potential parameters have been less investigated or even neglected. Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the harvesting process of adipose tissue as the primary cause of cell damage and to determine the risk factors associated with low cell survival. Methods Thirty-nine male and female subjects undergoing planned elective liposuction or abdominoplasty were enrolled. Forty-seven lipoaspirates harvested by different liposuction techniques were analyzed. RNA isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to elucidate differences in the expression of various adipocyte markers. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopy was performed on various samples to determine the cell damage caused by the different techniques. Results A statistically significant lower expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ was detected in subjects with a higher BMI. A trend towards a lower expression of perilipin 1 in lipoaspirates harvested by a super wet + ultrasound technique, compared with dry and super wet techniques, was shown. The lo

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.