Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Radiographic evaluation and diagnosis of the failed frontal osteoplastic flap with fat obliteration.

Catalano PJ., Lawson W., Som P., Biller HF.

Prospective Study with a reported sample of 59, published in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1991) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1991)
Country
England
Reported sample size
59
Source database
PubMed
PMID
1901151
DOI
10.1177/019459989110400211

Abstract (original English)

In the absence of evidence of suppurative disease, clinical assessment of the symptomatic patient after frontal osteoplastic flap with fat obliteration is difficult because the cause of the pain is often neuralgic or from chronic vascular headache. Among 59 patients who have undergone this procedure at our institution since 1979, four required revision surgery. These patients were evaluated by computed tomographic and magnetic resonance scans, and the radiographic findings were compared with those present in 20 asymptomatic subjects. On the basis of the results of this study, we believe we can objectively identify those patients with chronic pain in whom the operation has been unsuccessful. A review of our experience with this procedure is presented along with criteria that enable early diagnosis of recurrent disease in the frontal sinus after osteoplastic sinusotomy.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdultAgedBone TransplantationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFrontal SinusFrontal SinusitisHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.