Rat Spine Fusion Models for Preclinical Research: Opportunities and Challenges
Lobao A., Rice SW., Chapman J., Stauff MP., Song J.
Narrative Review on Back & Spine, Systemic / IV, published in ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- ACS Biomater Sci Eng (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41277865
- PMCID
- PMC12766858
- DOI
- 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c01330
Abstract (original English)
Rodent models have gained popularity for assessing the efficacy and safety of experimental spine fusion methods in preclinical research, but variability in surgical technique, graft materials, and outcome assessment has limited standardization across studies. This review highlights key developments in rat spinal fusion models, focusing on the strengths and limitations of the surgical techniques applied and advancements in quantitative and qualitative outcome measures, aiming to identify opportunities for increased consistency in experimental designs. A comprehensive literature review was performed by using PubMed to include studies utilizing rat models for spinal fusion. Posterolateral intertransverse fusion remains the most widely used model, often employing autografts or biologically enhanced scaffolds as controls, while the Wiltse paraspinal approach is chosen when minimal invasiveness is favored. Functional fusion outcome assessments have evolved from manual palpation and traditional radiography to sophisticated microcomputed tomography (μCT) analyses along with histological scoring and serum marker analyses. Consensus biomechanical analyses of rodent spine fusion outcomes remain lacking. Emerging rodent data on the effects of pharmacologic agents, systemic conditions, and biologic implants on fusion show wide-ranging fusion rates from 0% to 100% across studies. Overall, th
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Stem cell therapy for degenerative disc disease: A systematic review of preclinical evidence, clinical translation, and future directions
Systematic Review on Back Pain, Disc Degeneration, published in N Am Spine Soc J (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
N Am Spine Soc J - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Association between platelet to lymphocyte ratio and the risk of vertebral fracture in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Back & Spine, published in Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The Role of Exosome-miRNA as Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review of Case-Control and Longitudinal Studies
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 3046 on Neuroinflammation, published in Actas Esp Psiquiatr (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 3046
Actas Esp Psiquiatr - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Platelet-Rich Plasma vs. Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Lumbar Disc Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis on Disc Degeneration, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Host immune determinants of stromal vascular fraction graft survival: Toward a concept of SVF therapy resistance - A systematic narrative review.
Systematic Review on Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Inflammation, Immune Modulation, published in Cell Transplant (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cell Transplant - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell-derived exosome treatment for acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on preclinical evidence.
Meta-analysis on Spinal Cord Injury, published in Front Neurol (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Front Neurol