Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Recent Advances in the Clinical Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus (2021-2023): A Narrative Review

Liao H., Fu B., Yang P., Chen K., Wei Y., Zeng C.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, Ankle Injury, published in Orthop Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Orthop Surg (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40371488
PMCID
PMC12214417
DOI
10.1111/os.70066

Abstract (original English)

The management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) remains a challenging clinical issue. With advances in theory and technology, treatment options for OLT have expanded significantly. This review examines recent progress in the clinical treatment of OLT, focusing on studies published from 2021 to 2023. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant clinical treatments, including both nonsurgical and surgical approaches. Surgical advancements have primarily centered on microfracture, bone transplantation, cartilage transplantation, combined cell therapy, and biomaterials. Among these, some innovative methods, such as autologous costal cartilage transplantation and biological scaffolds, have yielded promising clinical outcomes. However, high-quality clinical studies are still lacking, particularly those exploring nonsurgical treatments and physical therapy. Future research may increasingly focus on integrating biomaterials with physical therapy, which holds potential for improving patient outcomes.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cartilage, ArticularTalusHumansBone Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research