Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Recent Advances in PEEK for Biomedical Applications: A Comprehensive Review of Material Properties, Processing, and Additive Manufacturing

Dallal S., Eslami B., Tiari S.

Narrative Review on Face & Skin, published in Polymers (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Polymers (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40732846
PMCID
PMC12300588
DOI
10.3390/polym17141968
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a high-performance thermoplastic polymer widely recognized for its distinct mechanical strength, chemical resistance, and biocompatibility. These characteristics make it suitable for a wide range of applications, particularly in medical, aerospace, chemical, and electronics fields. Conventional processing techniques, such as 3D printing, molding, and extrusion, are widely employed for PEEK fabrication. This review critically examines recent advancements in PEEK research, with an emphasis on additive manufacturing techniques that are expanding its applications in the medical field. We provide an in-depth analysis of PEEK's intrinsic properties, diverse processing methods, and current challenges that hinder its wider adoption. In addition to evaluating PEEK's performance, this review compares it with alternative biomaterials-such as titanium and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)-to explore its advantages and limitations in biomedical applications. Furthermore, this review discusses cost considerations, regulatory constraints, long-term clinical performance challenges, and failure modes that are essential for validating and ensuring the reliability of PEEK in clinical use. By synthesizing the recent literature, particularly from the last decade, this review highlights the significant potential of PEEK and underscores ongoing research

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research