Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Recent advances in the regulatory and non-coding RNA biology of osteogenic differentiation: biological functions and significance for bone healing

Aranguren S., Cole H., Dargan LJ., Sarlo M., Choi S., Satapathy I.

Narrative Review, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Front Cell Dev Biol (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39834390
PMCID
PMC11743950
DOI
10.3389/fcell.2024.1483843
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Injuries associated with contemporary life, such as automobile crashes and sports injuries, can lead to large numbers of traumatic neuromuscular injuries that are intimately associated with bone fractures. Regulatory and non-coding RNAs play essential roles in multiple cellular processes, including osteogenic differentiation and bone healing. In this review, we discuss the most recent advances in our understanding of the regulatory and non-coding RNA biology of osteogenic differentiation in stem, stromal and progenitor cells. We focused on circular RNAs, small nucleolar RNAs and PIWI-interacting RNAs and comprehensively summarized their biological functions as well as discussed their significance for bone healing and tissue regeneration.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.