Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Recent developments in Achilles tendon risk-analyzing rupture factors for enhanced injury prevention and clinical guidance: Current implications of regenerative medicine

Sankova MV., Beeraka NM., Oganesyan MV., Rizaeva NA., Sankov AV., Shelestova OS.

Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, Ligament Injury, published in J Orthop Translat (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Orthop Translat (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39559294
PMCID
PMC11570240
DOI
10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.024
Citations
9

Abstract (original English)

Background In recent years, many countries have actively implemented programs and strategies to promote physical education and sports. Despite these efforts, the increase in physical activity has been accompanied by a significant rise in muscle and tendon-ligament injuries, with Achilles tendon rupture being the most prevalent, accounting for 47 % of such injuries. This review aims to summarize all significant factors determining the predisposition of the Achilles tendon to rupture, to develop effective personalized prevention measures. Objective To identify and evaluate the risk factors contributing to Achilles tendon rupture and to develop strategies for personalized prevention. Methods This review utilized data from several databases, including Elsevier, Global Health, PubMed-NCBI, Embase, Medline, Scopus, ResearchGate, RSCI, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, eLibrary.ru, and CyberLeninka. Both non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors for Achilles tendon injuries and ruptures were analyzed. Results The analysis identified several non-modifiable risk factors, such as genetic predisposition, anatomical and functional features of the Achilles tendon, sex, and age. These factors should be considered when selecting sports activities and designing training programs. Modifiable risk factors included imbalanced nutrition, improper exercise regimens, and inadequate monitoring of Ac

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research