Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Recent Evidence for Orthobiologics Combined with Hydrogels for Joint Tissue Regeneration: Focus on Osteoarthritis

Cavallo C., Desando G., D'Alessandro M., Grigolo B., Roseti L.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, published in Gels (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Gels (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40710712
PMCID
PMC12294168
DOI
10.3390/gels11070551
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Osteoarthritis is a significant global problem, causing pain and limitations, and contributing to socioeconomic expenses. The etiopathogenesis of this disease encloses genetic, biological, and mechanical aspects. Regenerative medicine, utilizing tissue engineering, has opened the way to new therapeutic approaches employing various orthobiologics. Combined with hydrogels, these compounds may represent a notable option for treating degenerative and inflammatory lesions in OA. The review reports on the main orthobiologics used in preclinical and clinical studies, as well as their association with various types of natural and synthetic hydrogels. Research may increasingly focus on tailored therapies adjusted to suit the joint involved and the severity of the pathology encountered in each patient.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research