Recombinant fibrous protein biomaterials meet skin tissue engineering
Li D., Wang Y., Zhu S., Hu X., Liang R.
Narrative Review, published in Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Front Bioeng Biotechnol (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39205856
- PMCID
- PMC11349559
- DOI
- 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1411550
- Citations
- 6
Abstract (original English)
Natural biomaterials, particularly fibrous proteins, are extensively utilized in skin tissue engineering. However, their application is impeded by batch-to-batch variance, limited chemical or physical versatility, and environmental concerns. Recent advancements in gene editing and fermentation technology have catalyzed the emergence of recombinant fibrous protein biomaterials, which are gaining traction in skin tissue engineering. The modular and highly customizable nature of recombinant synthesis enables precise control over biomaterial design, facilitating the incorporation of multiple functional motifs. Additionally, recombinant synthesis allows for a transition from animal-derived sources to microbial sources, thereby reducing endotoxin content and rendering recombinant fibrous protein biomaterials more amenable to scalable production and clinical use. In this review, we provide an overview of prevalent recombinant fibrous protein biomaterials (collagens, elastin, silk proteins and their chimeric derivatives) used in skin tissue engineering (STE) and compare them with their animal-derived counterparts. Furthermore, we discuss their applications in STE, along with the associated challenges and future prospects.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.