Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Recommendations for the safe implementation of intravenous administration of mesenchymal stromal cells

Terai S., Ezoe S., Mano K., Matsuzaki Y., Sato Y., Yamahara K.

Narrative Review on Systemic / IV, published in Regen Ther (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Ther (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40191036
PMCID
PMC11968263
DOI
10.1016/j.reth.2025.01.024
Citations
4

Abstract (original English)

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are immunosuppressive, inflammation-reducing, and fibrosis-modifying cells that are currently being used for a variety of diseases. In this context, the transvenous administration of MSCs must be performed correctly under controlled standards. To support clinical practitioners, the Japanese Society for Regenerative Medicine (JSRM) formed Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Infusion Working Group and developed a proposal on the management standards that should be followed by medical practitioners in the implementation of regenerative medicine regarding the transvenous administration of MSCs. This review provides a comprehensive framework for the appropriate explanation of intravenous MSC administration to patients, including detailed discussions on the associated risks, protocols for addressing potential complications during administration, and strategies for ensuring patient safety. Particular emphasis is placed on the precautions and preparations necessary to mitigate the risk of fat embolism during MSC administration. The review outlines methods for patient monitoring to prevent such adverse events, protocols for responding effectively if a fat embolism occurs, and best practices for the handling of mesenchymal stem cells to minimize the likelihood of complications. Additionally, it includes recommendations for post-administration patient observation to

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research