Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsCase Report / SeriesPubMed

Reconstruction of the nasal tip.

Cervelli V., Bottini DJ., Gentile P.

Case Report / Series with a reported sample of 132 on Scar, Facial Rejuvenation, published in J Craniofac Surg (2007) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Case Report / Series
Journal
J Craniofac Surg (2007)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
132
Source database
PubMed
PMID
17993885
DOI
10.1097/scs.0b013e31814fb6e8

Abstract (original English)

Defects of the nasal tip present complex problems in terms of reconstruction, since they involve an important region both from functional and anatomical points of view. The authors present their experience in reconstructive surgery of the nasal tip, evaluating the results related to the use of flaps and free grafts. Among their cases, 132 patients were selected, with a prevalence of female patients, with a median age of 60. The deformities observed were postsurgical, following the exeresis of benign and malignant neoformations. The techniques utilized involved the use of median frontal, nasomental and nasolabial flaps. Of all of the patients treated, good aesthetic results were obtained in 79% of the cases, characterized by a good projection of the tip and by minor scar retraction, with full satisfaction on the part of the surgeon and the patient. On the other hand, some patients were defined as nonsatisfactory, with the deformity caused by scar retraction of the tip and abnormalities in color and thickness of the skin grafted. With a few exceptions, the patients had a good postoperative recovery without events worthy of note. On the basis of the results obtained, we can recommend advancement flap for lateral nasal defects, transposition of nasolabial flap for the reconstruction of the nasal alar. Naso-labial flaps with a subcutaneous pedicle are effective for correcting injure

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • Without an adequate control group, treatment effects cannot be separated from other factors.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SeptumNose Deformities, Acquired

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research