Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

The regeneration potential after human and autologous stem cell transplantation in a rat sciatic nerve injury model can be monitored by MRI.

Tremp M., Meyer Zu Schwabedissen M., Kappos EA., Engels PE., Fischmann A., Scherberich A.

Animal Study, published in Cell Transplant (2013) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Cell Transplant (2013)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
24380629
DOI
10.3727/096368913X676934
Citations
27

Abstract (original English)

Traumatic nerve injuries are a major clinical challenge. Tissue engineering using a combination of nerve conduits and cell-based therapies represents a promising approach to nerve repair. The aim of this study was to examine the regeneration potential of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) after transplantation in a nonautogenous setting and to compare them with autogenous rat ASCs (rASCs) for early peripheral nerve regeneration. Furthermore, the use of MRI to assess the continuous process of nerve regeneration was elaborated. The sciatic nerve injury model in female Sprague-Dawley rats was applied, and a 10-mm gap created by using a fibrin conduit seeded with the following cell types: rASCs, Schwann cell (SC)-like cells from rASC, rat SCs (rSCs), hASCs from the superficial and deep abdominal layer, as well as human stromal vascular fraction (1 × 10(6) cells). As a negative control group, culture medium only was used. After 2 weeks, nerve regeneration was assessed by immunocytochemistry. Furthermore, MRI was performed after 2 and 4 weeks to monitor nerve regeneration. Autogenous ASCs and SC-like cells led to accelerated peripheral nerve regeneration, whereas the human stem cell groups displayed inferior results. Nevertheless, positive trends could be observed for hASCs from the deep abdominal layer. By using a clinical 3T MRI scanner, we were able to visualize the graft as

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFibrinHumansImmunohistochemistryMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve RegenerationPeripheral Nerve Injuries

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.