Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewPubMed

Regenerative Cells for the Management of Osteoarthritis and Joint Disorders: A Concise Literature Review.

Block TJ., Garza JR.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, published in Aesthet Surg J (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Aesthet Surg J (2017)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
29025215
DOI
10.1093/asj/sjx015

Abstract (original English)

As the global population ages, the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) and joint disorders represent a major cause of disability and a significant public health burden. As current approaches for the management of OA focus on slowing the progression of disease, without repairing the underlying damage, novel treatments are necessary to improve outcomes. Over the past decade, autologous cell-based therapies using regenerative cells from fat or bone marrow have become a major focus of research into new approaches for the treatment of osteoarthritis and joint disorders. This review is intended to summarize findings in existing literature and identify gaps in knowledge that should be addressed in order to advance the field. We acknowledge that some findings may appear inconsistent, but show that apparent inconsistency in the literature may be attributable to variation in source of cells, stage of disease, method of delivery, follow-up time, evaluation method, and a number of other idiosyncrasies of individual studies. Still, a number of themes emerge from the data and some broader conclusions may be drawn that can be used to guide future studies. Ultimately, we conclude that there is overwhelming evidence demonstrating the safety of the autologous cell-based therapies. Furthermore, the data support the claim that regenerative cells are capable of reversing progression of OA. Regenerati

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyDisease ProgressionHumansJoint DiseasesOsteoarthritisRegenerative MedicineTransplantation, Autologous

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research