Regenerative medicine for radiation emergencies
Higashi Y., Yusoff FM., Kishimoto S., Maruhashi T.
Laboratory Study, published in J Radiat Res (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- J Radiat Res (2021)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 33978185
- PMCID
- PMC8114226
- DOI
- 10.1093/jrr/rraa091
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Hiroshima University is a 'medical institution for tertiary radiation emergencies' and a 'medical support organization as a part of the International Atomic Emergency Agency Emergency Preparedness Response-Response and Assistance Network (IAEA EPR-RANET)'. To establish a system of regenerative medicine for radiation emergencies with treatment by implantation of various types of cells derived from induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells, it is necessary to establish methods of defense against and treatment for radiation-induced damage from nuclear power plant accidents and nuclear terrorism. It is also necessary to develop cell therapy, cellular repair technology and regenerative biotechnology as regenerative medicine for radiation emergencies. Such applications have not been established yet. To develop a regenerative medical system, by using the existing one, for radiation emergencies, we will attempt to manage the cell-processing center to establish a safe and secured iPS cell bank for radiation medicine. By using this iPS cell bank as the central leverage, we will develop an education program for radiation emergency medicine and construct a network of regenerative medicine for radiation emergency medicine.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.