Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Regenerative Medicine Strategies in Biomedical Implants

Bijukumar DR., McGeehan C., Mathew MT.

Narrative Review on Osteoarthritis, published in Curr Osteoporos Rep (2018) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Curr Osteoporos Rep (2018)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
29679306
PMCID
PMC6033057
DOI
10.1007/s11914-018-0441-0
Citations
13

Abstract (original English)

Purpose of review Recently, significant progress has been made in the research related to regenerative medicine. At the same time, biomedical implants in orthopedics and dentistry are facing many challenges and posing clinical concerns. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the clinical applications of current regenerative strategies to the fields of dentistry and orthopedic surgery. The main research question in this review is: What are the major advancement strategies in regenerative medicine that can be used for implant research? Recent findings The implant surfaces can be modified through patient-specific stem cells and plasma coatings, which may provide methods to improve osseointegration and sustainability of the implant. Overall understanding from the review suggesting that the outcome from the studies could lead to identify optimum solutions for many concerns in biomedical implants and even in drug developments as a long-term solution to orthopedic and dental patients.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Stem CellsHumansOsteoarthritisDental ImplantsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProstheses and ImplantsJoint ProsthesisHip ProsthesisKnee Prosthesis

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research