Regenerative potential of pluripotent nontumorgenetic stem cells: Multilineage differentiating stress enduring cells (Muse cells).
Cao J., Yang Z., Xiao R., Pan B.
Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, Cardiovascular Disease, Stroke Research, published in Regen Ther (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Regen Ther (2020)
- Country
- Netherlands
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 33426206
- PMCID
- PMC7770368
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.reth.2020.04.011
- Citations
- 15
Abstract (original English)
Multilineage differentiating stress enduring cells (Muse cells), double positive for SSEA-3 and CD105, can be isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) or sever cellular conditions from dermal fibroblasts, bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs), adipose tissue derived stem cells (ADSCs), fresh bone marrow and liposuction fat. When cultured in a single-cell suspension, Muse cells can grow into characteristic cell clusters. Muse cells maintain pluripotency as evidenced by pluripotent markers in vitro. Besides, Muse cells have no tumorigenesis up to 6 months in SCID mice. Muse cells differentiate into cells representative of all three germ layers both spontaneously and under specific induction. In comparison to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), Muse cells show higher homing and migration capabilities to damaged sites which is predominantly attributed to S1P-S1PR2 axis. The regenerative effects of Muse cells have been demonstrated by many models in vivo or in vitro, including stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, aortic aneurysm, lung injuries, liver fibrosis, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, osteochondral defects and skin ulcer. In general, migration, differentiation and paracrine play a pivotal role in the regeneration capability. Here we review the isolation, core properties, preclinical studies as well as the underling molecular and cellular details to h
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Systematic Review on Amnion as a Cell Delivery Scaffolding Material for Cartilage Regeneration in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Studies.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Bioengineering (Basel) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Bioengineering (Basel)1 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Intra-articular adipose-derived cell therapies for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Systematic Review on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne) - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Subchondral Knee Injections: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Current Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Arthroplasty Delay
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 5 on Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Cartilage (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 5
Cartilage - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for osteochondral defect regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical studies
Meta-analysis on Cartilage Damage, published in J Transl Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Transl Med - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
The role of costal cartilage in musculoskeletal regeneration: A systematic review
Systematic Review on Cartilage Damage, published in J Exp Orthop (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Exp Orthop - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
A Comparison of the Properties of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Different Synovial Sources: A Systematic Review.
Systematic Review on Osteoarthritis, Cartilage Damage, published in Int J Mol Sci (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Int J Mol Sci