Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Regenerative Strategies for Vocal Fold Repair Using Injectable Materials

Yeou SH., Shin YS.

Narrative Review on Scar, published in Biomimetics (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Biomimetics (Basel) (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41294420
PMCID
PMC12650332
DOI
10.3390/biomimetics10110748

Abstract (original English)

Injectable biomaterials for vocal fold disorders are being developed to provide not only mechanical reinforcement but also a regenerative microenvironment. Recent hydrogels based on hyaluronic acid (HA) derivatives, calcium hydroxylapatite and decellularized matrix scaffolds are designed to approximate the viscoelastic behavior of native tissue, allow controlled degradation, and modulate local immune responses. Rather than serving merely as space-filling agents, several of these materials deliver extracellular matrix (ECM)-like biochemical signals that help maintain pliability and overcome some limitations of conventional augmentation. Experimental and early clinical studies involving growth factor delivery, stem cell-based injections, and ECM-mimetic hydrogels have demonstrated improved mucosal wave vibration and reduced fibrosis in cases of scarring. In clinical series, benefits from basic fibroblast growth factor can persist for up to 12 months. Further progress will depend on correlating material properties with objective vibratory performance to achieve lasting restoration of phonation and advance true tissue-regenerative therapy.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research