Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Regulation of myelopoiesis by murine fibroblastic and adipogenic cell lines.

Hangoc G., Daub R., Maze RG., Falkenburg JH., Broxmeyer HE., Harrington MA.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Exp Hematol (1993) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Exp Hematol (1993)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
8462659

Abstract (original English)

The regulation of hematopoiesis has been suggested to take place in close association with various cell types found in the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. In the present study the role of fibroblasts, adipocytes and cell surface heparan sulfate in regulating hematopoiesis in an in vitro mouse system was examined. Mouse BM cells were allowed to adhere to a mouse embryo fibroblast cell line (C3H 10T1/2) or a clonally derived adipogenically determined derivative (Clone D) of the 10T1/2 cell line. Nonadherent cells were removed, cultures were overlaid with semisolid media supplemented with growth factors and colony formation by granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), erythroid (BFU-E) and multipotential (CFU-GEMM) progenitor cells was quantitated. Adherence and co-culture of BM cells with the fibroblast cell line resulted in increased numbers of total CFU-GM and CFU-GEMM colonies. In contrast, adherence and co-culture of BM cells with the adipocytic cell line resulted in an increase only in CFU-GEMM colonies. Morphological analysis revealed a preferential adherence/growth of granulocyte and macrophage progenitors at the expense of bipotent granulocyte-macrophage progenitors to the fibroblastic cell line and an increase in the adherence/growth of granulocyte progenitors to the adipogenic cell line. Progenitor cell adherence was abolished when the fibroblastic or adipocytic cell lines we

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Adipose TissueAnimalsBone Marrow CellsCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCell LineColony-Forming Units AssayExtracellular MatrixFemale

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research