Remarkably higher efficacy and a wider safety window for nonfrontline over first-line drug combinations in the adenocarcinoma Colo 320DM cell line.
Garza-Trevino EN., Rodriguez-Gonzalez MS., Delgado Gonzalez P., Alonso-Cruz YG., Alonso-Cruz YG., Soto-Dominguez A.
Laboratory Study, published in J BUON (2017) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Laboratory Study
- Journal
- J BUON (2017)
- Country
- Cyprus
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 29135091
Abstract (original English)
To determine in vitro, the efficacy and safety window of not-front-line and first-line anti-colorectal (CRC) drug combinations. The adenocarcinoma cell line Colo 320DM and normal human mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue were used respectively to determine the anti-CRC efficacy (% of Colo 320DM cell death [CD]) and safety window [SW] - % Colo 320DM percent cancer death (PCD)/% of mesenchymal stem cell's death) of drug combinations, using the adenosine triphosphate-based chemotherapy response assay (ATP-CRA). First-line anti-CRC drug combinations (5-fluorouracil [5FU]/oxaliplatin [oxa] and 5-FU/Oxa /leucovorin [Leuco]) produced 57.7% and 52.4% CD, and 1.38 and 2.44 SW, respectively. Combinations of 5-FU/Oxa and 1 to 3 non-front line drugs led to 56.3-99.8% CD and to 0.96-2.2 SW. The highest safety window corresponded to 5FU/Oxa/ carboplatin [Carbo] (93% CD and 1.4 SW) and to 5-FU/ Oxa/cisplatin [Cispl] (93.5% CD and 1.4 SW). In contrast, non-front line drugs led to 89.8-97.4% CD and to 1.1-78.2 SW. Outstandingly, those combinations containing Carbo/ Cispl/3,3'-diindolylmethane (DIM), aspirin (Asp), or 3,3'- DIM/ Asp showed a very high CD (91.9-96.9% [39.2-39.5 times higher than first-line-combined drugs]) and very wide SW (57.8-81.56 [66.6-40 times higher than the first-line drug combinations]). Human mesenchymal stem cells could be an excellent alternative to lab
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.