Remote actuation and on-demand activation of biomaterials pre-incorporated with physical cues for bone repair
Kong X., Zheng T., Wang Z., Zhou T., Shi J., Wang Y.
Narrative Review, published in Theranostics (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Theranostics (2024)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 39113795
- PMCID
- PMC11303086
- DOI
- 10.7150/thno.97610
- Citations
- 9
Abstract (original English)
The high incidence of bone defect-related diseases caused by trauma, infection, and tumor resection has greatly stimulated research in the field of bone regeneration. Generally, bone healing is a long and complicated process wherein manipulating the biological activity of interventional scaffolds to support long-term bone regeneration is significant for treating bone-related diseases. It has been reported that some physical cues can act as growth factor substitutes to promote osteogenesis through continuous activation of endogenous signaling pathways. This review focuses on the latest progress in bone repair by remote actuation and on-demand activation of biomaterials pre-incorporated with physical cues (heat, electricity, and magnetism). As an alternative method to treat bone defects, physical cues show many advantages, including effectiveness, noninvasiveness, and remote manipulation. First, we introduce the impact of different physical cues on bone repair and potential internal regulatory mechanisms. Subsequently, biomaterials that mediate various physical cues in bone repair and their respective characteristics are summarized. Additionally, challenges are discussed, aiming to provide new insights and suggestions for developing intelligent biomaterials to treat bone defects and promote clinical translation.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.