Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Repair of cranial bone defects with adipose derived stem cells and coral scaffold in a canine model.

Cui L., Liu B., Liu G., Zhang W., Cen L., Sun J.

Animal Study on Face & Skin, published in Biomaterials (2007) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Biomaterials (2007)
Country
Netherlands
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
17888508
DOI
10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.042
Citations
180

Abstract (original English)

Adipose derived stem cells (ASCs) with osteogenic differentiation potential have been documented as an alternative cell source for bone regeneration. However, most of previous in vivo studies were carried out on small animals along with relatively short-term follow-up. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using ASCs and coral scaffolds to repair a cranial bone defect in a canine model, and followed up the outcome for up to 6 month. Autologous ASCs isolated from canine subcutaneous fat were expanded, osteogenically induced, and seeded on coral scaffolds. Bilateral full-thickness defects (20 mm x 20 mm) of parietal bone were created. The defects were either repaired with ASC-coral constructs (experimental group) or with coral alone (control group). Three-dimensional CT scan showed that new bones were formed in the experimental group at 12 weeks post-implantation, while coral scaffolds were partially degraded in the control group. By radiographic analysis at 24 weeks post-transplantation, it was shown that an average of 84.19+/-6.45% of each defect volume had been repaired in experimental side, while the control side had only 25.04+/-18.82% of its volume filled. Histological examination revealed that the defect was repaired by typical bone tissue in experimental side, while only minimal bone formation with fibrous connection was observed in the control group. The succ

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell SeparationCraniofacial AbnormalitiesDogsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningModels, AnimalSkullStem Cell Transplantation

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research