Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

Repair of palatal bone defects using osteogenically differentiated fat-derived stem cells.

Conejero JA., Lee JA., Parrett BM., Terry M., Wear-Maggitti K., Grant RT.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 8, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2006) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2006)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
8
Source database
PubMed
PMID
16525276
DOI
10.1097/01.prs.0000204566.13979.c1

Abstract (original English)

Although autogenous bone grafting remains the standard in the reconstruction of bone defects, disadvantages may include limited amount of bone and donor-site morbidity. Tissue engineering approaches can potentially obviate these problems. Fat contains a population of stem cells that can be isolated and differentiated into various cell lines, including osteocytes, adipocytes, and myocytes, depending on the culture conditions. In this study, the authors used osteogenically differentiated fat-derived stem cells to repair rat palatal bone defects. Fat-derived stem cells were isolated, differentiated into osteocytes in osteogenic medium, and seeded onto poly-L-lactic acid scaffolds. Rat palatal bone defects were surgically made and animals divided into four groups according to the type of implant for bone repair: group I, empty defect; group II, poly-L-lactic acid without cells; group III, poly-L-lactic acid with undifferentiated fat-derived stem cells; and group IV, poly-L-lactic acid with osteogenically differentiated fat-derived stem cells. Palates were harvested at 6 or 12 weeks after implantation (n = 8 per group at each time interval). Hematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemical staining for osteocalcin, and histomorphometric measurements of new bone were performed. Defects in groups I, II, and III had no bone and were primarily filled with fibrous tissue. In contrast,

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AdipocytesAdipose TissueAnimalsCell DifferentiationFeasibility StudiesImmunohistochemistryLactic AcidMaleOsteogenesisPalate

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.