Reprojecting the Severely Damaged Nose.
Hamilton GS., Jang YJ., Toriumi DM.
Narrative Review, published in Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am (2024)
- Country
- United States
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- PubMed
- PMID
- 39341677
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.fsc.2024.06.006
- Citations
- 1
Abstract (original English)
Reprojecting the severely damaged nose is a challenging operation fraught with pitfalls. This panel discussion covers 6 fundamental questions answered by 3 surgeons, each with decades of experience. Discussion points include management of the 3 components necessary for successful reconstruction-the soft tissue envelope, the support structure, and the internal lining. The authors also discuss how their practices have changed in the last few years.
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.