Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Requirements for standardizing the assessment of mesenchymal stem cell therapy and its effects on osteoarthritis.

Wang YC., Cheng JB., Feng ML.

Prospective Study on Osteoarthritis, published in World J Orthop (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
World J Orthop (2025)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
40124721
DOI
10.5312/wjo.v16.i3.104451

Abstract (original English)

Publications of Soufan et al and Kristjánsson et al in the World Journal of Orthopedics on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy for osteoarthritis (OA) represent a significant exploration of regenerative medicine's potential in OA treatment. In their research, it is highlighted that MSCs can alleviate OA symptoms and even regenerate cartilage, potentially reversing the disease. They also compared the efficacy of three MSC subtypes, emphasizing the therapeutic advantages of adipose-derived MSCs. MSC injections, a novel and less invasive alternative to traditional treatments such as chondrocyte transplantation or arthroplasty, have a low cost, low risks, and favorable outcomes, presenting a promising approach for OA patients. Additionally, we stressed that the efficacy evaluation criteria, heterogeneity, safety, and other factors must be carefully considered to further advance the clinical translation of MSC therapy for OA.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research