Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Research advance of 3D printing for articular cartilage regeneration

Tao H., Feng M., Feng H., Ren H.

Narrative Review on Cartilage Damage, published in Regen Med (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Regen Med (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39957623
PMCID
PMC11881833
DOI
10.1080/17460751.2025.2466346
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Articular cartilage lesion frequently leads to dysfunction and the development of degenerative diseases, posing a significant public health challenge due to the limited self-healing capacity of cartilage tissue. Current surgical treatments, including marrow stimulation techniques and osteochondral autografts/allografts, have limited efficacy or have significant drawbacks, highlighting the urgent need for alternative strategies. Advances in 3D printing for cartilage regeneration have shown promising potential in creating cartilage-mimicking constructs, thereby opening new possibilities for cartilage repair. In this review, we summarize current surgical treatment methods and their limitations for addressing articular cartilage lesion, various 3D printing strategies and their features in cartilage tissue engineering, seed cells from different sources, and different types of biomaterials. We also explore the benefits, current challenges, and future research directions for 3D printing in the treatment of articular cartilage lesion within the field of cartilage tissue engineering.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Cartilage, ArticularAnimalsHumansTissue EngineeringRegenerationTissue ScaffoldsPrinting, Three-Dimensional

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research