Research Progress and Challenges in 3D Printing of Bioceramics and Bioceramic Matrix Composites
Zhao X., Liu J., Li L.
Narrative Review, published in Biomimetics (Basel) (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Biomimetics (Basel) (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 40710241
- PMCID
- PMC12292408
- DOI
- 10.3390/biomimetics10070428
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Three-dimensional printing techniques can prepare complex bioceramic parts and scaffolds with high precision and accuracy, low cost, and customized geometry, which greatly broadens their application of 3D-printed bioceramics and bioceramic matrix composites in the clinical field. Nevertheless, the inadequate mechanical properties of 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds, such as compressive strength, wear resistance, flexural strength, fracture toughness, and other properties, are a bottleneck problem and severely limit their application, which are overcome by introducing reinforcements. Three-dimensional printing techniques and the mechanical property of bioceramics and bioceramic matrix composites with different reinforcements, as well as their potential applications for bone tissue engineering, are discussed. In addition, the biological performance of 3D-printed bioceramics and scaffolds and their applications are presented. To address the challenges of insufficient mechanical strength and mismatched biological performance in bioceramic scaffolds, we summarize current solutions, including the advantages and strengthening effects of fiber, particle, whisker, and ion doping. The effectiveness of these methods is analyzed. Finally, the limitations and challenges in 3D printing of bioceramics and bioceramic matrix composites are discussed to encourage future research in this field. Ou
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.