Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Research progress on molecular therapy for glaucoma (Review)

Wang W., Cheng G., Zhou Q., Wang S., Zhang L.

Narrative Review on Neuroinflammation, published in Mol Med Rep (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Mol Med Rep (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
41268594
PMCID
PMC12679902
DOI
10.3892/mmr.2025.13757

Abstract (original English)

Glaucoma is a notable public health concern as it can lead to irreversible vision loss; however, it remains challenging to treat effectively. Current options focus solely on managing intraocular pressure (IOP) to delay the progression of vision loss. The present review describes the multifaceted mechanisms of glaucoma and concludes by describing future promising treatment options that target specific mechanisms. Gene editing therapy is a promising option for patients with mutations known to cause glaucoma. Modulating the expression of genes involved in IOP regulation or neurodegeneration is another potential approach. Additionally, therapies targeting relevant molecular and metabolic pathways are also currently under investigation. The present review aims to highlight the most promising avenues for molecular intervention in glaucoma and guide future research efforts toward effective, long‑term solutions for preserving vision.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsHumansGlaucomaIntraocular PressureMolecular Targeted TherapyGenetic TherapyGene Editing

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research