Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesLaboratory StudyPubMed

RETRACTION to "Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells Inhibit Hypertrophic Scar (HS) Fibrosis via p38/MAPK Pathway".

Laboratory Study on Scar, published in J Cell Biochem (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Laboratory Study
Journal
J Cell Biochem (2024)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39655761
DOI
10.1002/jcb.30689

Abstract (original English)

Retraction C.-Y. Chai, J. Song, Z. Tan, I.-C. Tai, C. Zhang, and S. Sun, "Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells Inhibit Hypertrophic Scar (HS) Fibrosis via p38/MAPK Pathway," Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 120, no. 3 (2019): 4057-4064, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27689. The above article, published online on 27 September 2018 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors; the journal Editor-in-Chief, Christian Behl; and Wiley Periodicals LLC. The retraction has been agreed due to concerns raised by third parties on the data presented in the article. Specifically, multiple image elements in Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4 were found to have been previously published by different author groups. Accordingly, the conclusions of this article are considered invalid by the editors.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research