Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMC

Role of extracellular vesicles in stem cell biology

Bruno S., Chiabotto G., Favaro E., Deregibus MC., Camussi G.

Narrative Review on Chronic Inflammation, published in Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2019) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2019)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
31091143
PMCID
PMC6732418
DOI
10.1152/ajpcell.00129.2019
Citations
44

Abstract (original English)

The extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane vesicles carrying proteins, nucleic acids, and bioactive lipids of the cell of origin. These vesicles released within the extracellular space and entering into the circulation may transfer their cargo to neighboring or distant cells and induce phenotypical and functional changes that may be relevant in several physiopathological conditions. In an attempt to define the biological properties of EVs, several investigations have focused on their cargo and on the effects elicited in recipient cells. EVs have been involved in modulation of tumor microenvironment and behavior, as well as in the immune and inflammatory response. In the present review, we address the paracrine action of EVs released by stem cells and their potential involvement in the activation of regenerative programs in injured cells.

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Stem CellsAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsInflammationParacrine CommunicationSignal TransductionNeoplastic Stem CellsStem Cell NicheExosomes

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research