Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

The Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Vein Graft Disease

Layton GR., Somani R., Mariscalco G., Donoo F., Ng GA., Antoun I.

Narrative Review, published in Cells (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
Cells (2026)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
42193925
PMCID
PMC13204320
DOI
10.3390/cells15100916

Abstract (original English)

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using the autologous saphenous vein (SV) remains widely performed for obstructive atherosclerosis; however, vein graft disease drives recurrent ischaemia through early thrombosis and progressive intimal hyperplasia, and accelerated atherosclerosis developing within the grafts. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound particles that transfer proteins, lipids, and microRNAs between cells. They modulate endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching, inflammation, and coagulation, which are core processes in vein graft remodelling. Arterialisation exposes the vein to abrupt rises in shear stress, cyclic stretch, and intraluminal pressure. These forces increase EV release and reshape EV cargo in experimental systems, suggesting a potential mechanism for amplifying early graft injury which warrants direct investigation in vein tissue. This review synthesises current evidence for cell-specific EV contributions from ECs, vascular smooth muscle cells, platelets, and macrophages, and appraises EV-associated microRNAs with biomarker potential relevant to graft failure pathways. We also review therapeutic strategies that may modulate EV signalling including antiplatelet therapy, statins, KCa3.1 inhibition, and pro-reparative mesenchymal stromal cell-derived EVs. No published clinical studies evaluate EV-based biomark

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Saphenous VeinAnimalsHumansMicroRNAsCoronary Artery BypassExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.