Level D· Preclinical EvidenceAnimal Study

Role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α in Regulating Muscle Degeneration After Rotator Cuff Tears.

Zhang H., Lee A., Liu M., Diaz A., Zhang Y., Kim HT.

Animal Study on Tendon Injury, Rotator Cuff, published in Am J Sports Med (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Am J Sports Med (2026)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
PMID
42590923
DOI
10.1177/03635465261469689

Abstract (original English)

Secondary muscle degeneration after a rotator cuff tear (RCT) critically affects clinical outcomes. Vascular compromise after a tendon injury creates a complex microenvironment that may be associated with the degeneration of rotator cuff muscle. The role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), a master regulator of cellular stress responses to hypoxia, in modulating muscle abnormalities after an RCT remains undefined. To define the role of HIF-1α in stem cell differentiation and muscle degeneration after an RCT in a murine model. Controlled laboratory study. A supraspinatus tendon transection and suprascapular nerve transection (TTDN) model was established in C57BL/6J, platelet-derived growth factor receptor α (PDGFRα)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter, and inducible cell-specific HIF-1α knockout mice. Vascularity and HIF-1α colocalization with fibroadipogenic progenitor (FAP) cells and satellite cells were analyzed. Fibrosis, fatty infiltration, and myofiber cross-sectional area were assessed. In vitro, HIF-1α was modulated in isolated FAP cells via CRISPR-Cas9 or prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors to evaluate FAP cell differentiation. TTDN induced significant capillary density reduction (CD31 + ) at 1, 2, and 6 weeks after an injury. Global HIF-1α expression decreased after TTDN compared to the sham side (1 week: 0.78 ± 0.22 vs 1.40 ± 0.42, respectively [ P = .019];

What this study does not prove

  • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence comes from animal or laboratory studies and has not been confirmed in humans.

How we grade evidence

Related research