Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

The Role of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of a Chronic Rhinosinusitis-An In Vivo Mouse Model.

Trombitaș VE., Nagy AA., Berce C., Pall E., Tăbăran F., Ilea A.

Animal Study with a reported sample of 32 on Chronic Inflammation, published in Microorganisms (2021) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Microorganisms (2021)
Country
Switzerland
Reported sample size
32
Source database
PubMed
PMID
34070848
DOI
10.3390/microorganisms9061182

Abstract (original English)

Objectives/Hypothesis: It is acknowledged that the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) represents an important challenge for rhinology and for social and economic life. At present, one of the most common treatments for CRS is represented by local corticosteroids followed by endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Starting from the example of the mesenchymal stem cell's (MSC) capacity to migrate and to modulate a real response in the nasal mucosa of an allergic rhinitis mouse model, we try to obtain a response in a CRS mouse model, using MSC derived by adipose tissue. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the MSC can be used in CRS treatment and could change its priorities. Methods: Seventy female mice (6 MSC donor mice) were randomized in two stages of study, 32 Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) exposure mice (20 for histological comparison to 1st control mice and 12 for MSC administration, to CRS/MCS model) and 32 control mice (20 for histological comparison to CRS model and 12 for MSC administration and histological control to MSC model); in the first stage, the Aspergillus fumigatus (Af) CRS mouse model was targeted, in this section were included 64 ( n = 32) mice (treated and control group). In order to assess the inflammation level (histological analysis), the animals were euthanized; in the second stage MSCs (1 × 10 6 /animal) were administered intravenously to a total of 2

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research