Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesNarrative ReviewEurope PMCOpen access

Role of orthobiologics in managing patellar tendinopathy: A narrative review

Banerjee S., Balamarthandapuram Gopalakrishna R., Elhence A.

Narrative Review on Tendon Injury, published in J Exp Orthop (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Narrative Review
Journal
J Exp Orthop (2024)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
39055393
PMCID
PMC11269623
DOI
10.1002/jeo2.12099
Citations
2

Abstract (original English)

Patellar tendinopathy is a relatively common cause of anterior knee pain in athletes. It is predominantly seen in sports involving jumping, running, abrupt change in direction like basketball, volleyball, soccer, sprinting and jumping. The main pathophysiology is considered to be repetitive microtrauma at the inferior pole of patella along with a poor healing response. Although eccentric exercises have shown to be beneficial, the improvement is often slow and may result in a less than satisfactory outcome. There is a growing interest of orthobiologics, mainly platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in multiple chronic musculoskeletal pathologies. This narrative review aimed to analyse the current evidence on the role of orthobiologics in the management of recalcitrant patellar tendinopathy. Multiple studies have shown significant clinical improvement with negligible adverse effects on PRP injection for patellar tendinopathy. Most studies assessed report that the effects of PRP are sustained. However, among all studies evaluated, there is a considerable heterogeneity in terms of PRP composition, number of injections, dosage interval and postinjection rehabilitation protocol, pointing to the need for further research to enable standardisation of PRP therapy. Stem cells too have shown potential to be effective as a treatment modality for chronic patellar tendinopathy, but there is limited data

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research