Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsClinical TrialPubMed

The role of stem cells in aesthetic surgery: fact or fiction?

McArdle A., Senarath-Yapa K., Walmsley GG., Hu M., Atashroo DA., Tevlin R.

Clinical Trial on Face & Skin, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2014) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level B· Emerging clinical evidence with positive signalsEvidence level of this study

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Clinical Trial
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2014)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
24732654
PMCID
PMC4447486
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0000000000000404
Citations
29

Abstract (original English)

Background Stem cells are attractive candidates for the development of novel therapies, targeting indications that involve functional restoration of defective tissue. Although most stem cell therapies are new and highly experimental, there are clinics around the world that exploit vulnerable patients with the hope of offering supposed stem cell therapies, many of which operate without credible scientific merit, oversight, or other patient protection. Methods The authors review the potential and the drawbacks of incorporation of stem cells in cosmetic procedures. A review of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved indications and ongoing clinical trials with adipose stem cells is provided. Furthermore, a "snapshot" analysis of Web sites using the search terms "stem cell therapy" or "stem cell treatment" or "stem cell facelift" was performed. Results Despite the protective net cast by regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and professional societies such as the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the authors are witnessing worrying advertisements for procedures such as stem cell face lifts, stem cell breast augmentations, and even stem cell vaginal rejuvenation. The marketing and promotion of stem cell procedures in aesthetic surgery is not adequately supported by clinical evidence in the majority of cases. Conclusions Stem cells offer tremendous p

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.

How we grade evidence
Cosmetic TechniquesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMarketingOutcome Assessment, Health CareRejuvenationStem Cell TransplantationUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research