Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyPubMed

The Roles of Podoplanin-Positive/Podoplanin-Negative Cells from Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Lymphatic Regeneration.

Dai T., Jiang Z., Cui C., Sun Y., Lu B., Li H.

Animal Study, published in Plast Reconstr Surg (2020) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Plast Reconstr Surg (2020)
Country
United States
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
31985635
DOI
10.1097/PRS.0000000000006474
Citations
19

Abstract (original English)

Background Secondary lymphedema is a refractory disease, for which adipose-derived stem cells have shown some therapeutic potential. However, the mechanism of this action remains poorly understood. Methods The authors identified podoplanin-expressing adipose-derived stem cells, which allowed them to divide adipose-derived stem cells into podoplanin-positive and podoplanin-negative groups that they characterized in vitro. The authors then used a mouse hindlimb model for lymphedema to trace the fate of podoplanin-positive, podoplanin-negative, and unsorted adipose-derived stem cells in vivo. Results When induced in culture, podoplanin-positive cells were noted to up-regulate the expression of lymphatic endothelial cell markers, including LYVE-1, and assumed a cobblestone morphology. In addition, a substantial increase in lymphangiogenic cytokines was detected in the podoplanin-positive supernatant. The above findings were largely absent from the podoplanin-negative and unsorted groups. In the mouse model, the implanted cells relieved the limb lymphedema by promoting lymphangiogenesis, with the podoplanin-positive group showing the most significant effect. Immunocolocalization further revealed that the podoplanin-positive cells incorporated into lymphatic vessels were positive for LYVE-1. Conclusions These data demonstrated that actions by means of both paracrine and differentiati

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
AnimalsBiomarkersCells, CulturedCytokinesDisease Models, AnimalEndothelial CellsFemaleGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLymphangiogenesisLymphatic Vessels

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.