ROS-scavenging nanomaterials as emerging tools for bone tissue regeneration: A comprehensive review of recent progress
He W., Xu T., Wang M., Ni N., Su Y., Fan X.
Narrative Review on Scar, published in Acta Pharm Sin B (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Narrative Review
- Journal
- Acta Pharm Sin B (2025)
- Reported sample size
- —
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41477341
- PMCID
- PMC12750179
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.09.040
- Citations
- 2
Abstract (original English)
Bone defects, characterized by a loss of skeletal structure integrity, represent a prevalent clinical challenge affecting millions of patients. While bone autografts and allografts offer potential solutions, limitations, including donor scarcity, immune rejection, anatomical constraints, and complications arising from host comorbidities such as diabetes, often lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. This necessitates the need for alternative treatments. Researchers have identified that reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial role in bone regeneration. Although physiological ROS levels are essential for normal healing, excessive ROS accumulation disrupts the balance between bone formation and resorption, hindering regeneration. Antioxidants can mitigate oxidative stress by scavenging ROS or inhibiting their formation, thereby restoring the equilibrium between bone formation and resorption. Advances in nanotechnology have enabled the development of various ROS-scavenging nanomaterials with enhanced therapeutic efficacy. These nanomaterials either function as delivery platforms for conventional antioxidants or as direct ROS-neutralizing agents through intrinsic redox or enzyme-mimicking properties. This review comprehensively summarizes ROS-scavenging nanomaterials for bone tissue regeneration, focusing on their design strategies, underlying mechanisms, applications, and potential f
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
- • This is a narrative review: it collects no new patient data and does not systematically appraise evidence quality.
Evidence level
Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Clinical Applications of Autologous Fat Grafting in Pathological Hand Conditions.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 7 on Osteoarthritis, Scar, published in J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 7
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Stem cell therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 323 on Scar, published in Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 323
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol - Level AMeta-analysisEurope PMC
Therapeutic value of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles in hypertrophic and keloid scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Efficacy and safety of autologous cell-based therapies for atrophic acne scar treatment: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with in-depth methodological and clinical insights.
Meta-analysis with a reported sample of 500 on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Front Cell Dev Biol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
- n = 500
Front Cell Dev Biol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO<sub>2</sub> Laser and Gold Microneedling Radiofrequency for Atrophic Acne Scars: A Systematic Review
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Scar, published in Skin Res Technol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Skin Res Technol - Level AMeta-analysisPubMed
Role of exosome therapy in reconstructive surgery: a review.
Meta-analysis on Chronic Wound, Scar, Immune Modulation, published in Front Med (Lausanne) (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Med (Lausanne)1 citations