Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsProspective StudyPubMed

Safety and efficacy of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in elderly Parkinson's disease patients: an intermediate-size expanded access program.

Vij R., Kim H., Park H., Cheng T., Lotfi D., Chang D.

Prospective Study on Neuroinflammation, published in Cytotherapy (2024) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level C· Early human research exploring benefitsEvidence level of this study

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Prospective Study
Journal
Cytotherapy (2024)
Country
England
Reported sample size
—
Source database
PubMed
PMID
39425736
DOI
10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.09.004
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Objective This intermediate-size expanded access program aimed to evaluate safety and clinical efficacy of multiple intravenous infusions of autologous, Hope Biosciences adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (HB-adMSC) therapy in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods Ten eligible participants (aged 76-95 years) received six intravenous infusions each with 200MM autologous HB-adMSCs over 18 weeks, with the end of study (EOS) at week 26. Safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Efficacy was measured through improvements in both motor and non-motor symptoms, utilizing scales including Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) parts I-IV, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Parkinson's disease Fatigue Scale (PFS-16), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Analysis employed paired t-tests and Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) thresholds for the patient-reported outcomes. Results Most AEs (37 out of 46) were mild in severity, with 5 SAEs reported, none attributed to the drug. No deaths occurred. Despite lack of statistical significance across the efficacy endpoints, modest yet clinically meaningful improvements with effect size > 0.3 were observed in several secondary efficacy endpoints (MDS-UPDRS part I & III, PDQ-39, and PHQ-9) at

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.

Evidence level

Early human evidence such as case series or small samples is exploring possible benefits.

How we grade evidence
HumansParkinson DiseaseAgedFemaleMaleMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsAged, 80 and overAdipose TissueTreatment Outcome

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research