Safety and Efficacy of Micronized Acellular Dermal Matrix Injection for Correction of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds: A Double-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Non-inferior Clinical Trial
Zhang C., Chang X., Chen L., Wang H., Feng G., Zheng W.
Randomized Controlled Trial with a reported sample of 86 on Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
- Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
- Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
- Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
- Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
- Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.
- Study type
- Randomized Controlled Trial
- Journal
- Aesthetic Plast Surg (2026)
- Reported sample size
- 86
- Source database
- Europe PMC
- PMID
- 41381953
- PMCID
- PMC13219193
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00266-025-05494-4
Abstract (original English)
Background Nasolabial folds (NLFs) are prominent facial lines that deepen with age and may adversely affect facial aesthetics and psychosocial confidence. Injectable fillers, including micronized acellular dermal matrix (mADM), offer minimally invasive correction; however, clinical evidence for mADM's safety and efficacy remains limited. We conducted a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to compare an mADM filler (Regenfil) with a regulatory agency-approved cross-linked collagen filler (Sunmax Collagen Implant I-Plus). Methods Adults aged ≥18 years with Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) grade 3 or 4 NLFs were randomized to receive mADM or collagen. Six weeks after the initial treatment, a protocol-defined supplemental injection was permitted if additional correction was needed. Outcomes were assessed 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the last treatment. Efficacy endpoints included blinded-evaluator WSRS, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) rated by injectors and participants, and participant satisfaction. The prespecified primary endpoint was the percentage of participants achieving a >1-grade WSRS improvement simultaneously on both left and right NLFs. Safety was evaluated by monitoring device-related adverse events and local injection-site reactions. Results Of 202 randomized participants, 175 completed all required follow-ups for safety and ef
What this study does not prove
- • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
Evidence level
Several human studies show positive signals, while research methods and sample sizes continue to develop.
How we grade evidenceBrowse all related research
Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.
Related research
- Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Regeneration in Aesthetic Medicine: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Clinical Boundaries.
Systematic Review on Skin Aging, Immune Modulation, published in J Cosmet Dermatol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
J Cosmet Dermatol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Efficacy of Exosome-Based Therapies for Skin Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review of Human Studies
Systematic Review on Neuroinflammation, Skin Aging, published in Cureus (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Cureus - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Exosomes in Skin Rejuvenation: Systematic Review of Anti-Aging Effects and Clinical Applications.
Systematic Review on Chronic Wound, Skin Aging, published in Dermatol Pract Concept (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Dermatol Pract Concept - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Cutaneous lymphatics and skin diseases: mechanisms, imaging modalities, and future therapeutic strategies
Systematic Review on Skin Aging, Chronic Inflammation, Autoimmune Research, published in Front Physiol (2026) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2026
Front Physiol - Level ASystematic ReviewEurope PMC
Autolougous platelet concentrates in esthetic medicine
Systematic Review on Scar, Skin Aging, Facial Rejuvenation, Hair Regeneration, published in Periodontol 2000 (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
Periodontol 200016 citations - Level ASystematic ReviewPubMed
Hand Rejuvenation Using Autologous Fat Grafting: A Systematic Review of Recommended Doses, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction.
Systematic Review with a reported sample of 303 on Skin Aging, published in Aesthetic Plast Surg (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.
- 2025
- n = 303
Aesthetic Plast Surg