Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesAnimal StudyEurope PMCOpen access

Safety Evaluation and Biodistribution of Fetal Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles in Sprague Dawley Rats

Krishnan I., Vijakumaran U., Hwei NM., Xian LJ., Mohd Yusof MR., Thangarajah T.

Animal Study on Systemic / IV, published in Int J Mol Sci (2025) — summary generated from the PubMed abstract.

Open my reading list
Level D· Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studiesEvidence level of this study

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

  • Level A · Stronger Clinical Evidence
  • Level B · Emerging clinical evidence with positive signals
  • Level C · Early human research exploring benefits
  • Level D · Scientific groundwork from lab and animal studies
  • Emerging · Emerging topic under active research
Read the A–D evidence level guide

This page is generated from the PubMed record. The Thai description is an automated summary of bibliographic fields and the abstract, not a full translation, and is not medical advice.

Study type
Animal Study
Journal
Int J Mol Sci (2025)
Reported sample size
—
Source database
Europe PMC
PMID
40725053
PMCID
PMC12295939
DOI
10.3390/ijms26146806
Citations
1

Abstract (original English)

Umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UCMSCs)-derived small extracellular vehicles (sEVs) are reported to offer therapeutic effects in regenerative medicine, but they lack safety and biodistribution profiles to support smooth translation at the clinical stage and regulatory requirements. Our study aimed to determine the safety and biodistribution profile in a healthy animal model before application in the metabolic syndrome model. Method: Healthy male Sprague Dawley (SD) rats were given an intravenous (IV) injection of normal saline (control group) or pooled fetal UCMSCs-derived sEVs (treated group) every three weeks for 90 days. Morbidity and mortality observation (daily), physical measurements (weekly), selected serum biochemistry (every three weeks), and hematology (every three weeks) were performed for 90 days. Acute toxicity (on day 14) and sub-chronic toxicity (on day 90) were assessed for gross necropsy, relative organ weight, and histopathological assessment of lungs, liver, spleen, kidney, and lymph nodes. Separately, a biodistribution study was conducted with the sEVs preparations labeled with PKH26 fluorescent dye, given intravenously to the rats. The organs were harvested 24 h post-injection. There were no drastic changes in either group's morbidity or mortality, physical, hematological, and biochemistry evaluation. The histopathological assessment concluded modera

What this study does not prove

  • • This study does not prove SVF is an approved treatment or a replacement for standard care.
  • • This is preclinical work; animal or laboratory results cannot be applied to humans.

Evidence level

Evidence from laboratory and animal studies provides groundwork for understanding mechanisms and potential before human studies continue.

How we grade evidence
Mesenchymal Stem CellsUmbilical CordAnimalsHumansRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationTissue DistributionMaleExtracellular Vesicles

Browse all related research

Filter the research library by this study's title keywords, author, or publication year.

Related research